+0.94% Bitcoin (BTC) 76000 EUR
+1.72% Ethereum (ETH) 2586.32 EUR
+0.75% Litecoin (LTC) 66.39 EUR
-2.63% B-Cash (BCH) 498.97 EUR
+0.76% Ethereum (ETH) 0.0343804 BTC
-0.34% Litecoin (LTC) 0.00088274 BTC
-3.40% B-Cash (BCH) 0.00658015 BTC
+1.01% Bitcoin (BTC) 89970.699 USDC
-0.08% USD Coin (USDC) 0.85 EUR
+0.09% Chainlink (LINK) 10.82 EUR
-0.20% Chainlink (LINK) 0.00014327 BTC
+0.34% Dogecoin (DOGE) 0.11 EUR
-0.66% Dogecoin (DOGE) 0.00000149 BTC
-0.77% Uniswap (UNI) 5.42 EUR
-3.03% Uniswap (UNI) 0.0000709 BTC
-0.43% Cardano (ADA) 0.31 EUR
-1.65% Cardano (ADA) 0.00000416 BTC
+1.50% Tron (TRX) 0.24 EUR
+0.61% Tron (TRX) 0.00000326 BTC
-2.03% Shiba Inu (SHIB) 0.00000625 EUR
0.00% TradeFlow (TFLOW) 0.12216892 BUSD
-0.15% Arbitrum (ARB) 0.1895 USDC
+0.16% Chainlink (LINK) 12.55 USD
+0.19% Chainlink (LINK) 12.54782 USDC
-0.48% Uniswap (UNI) 6.307 USDC
-0.21% USD Coin (USDC) 0.74 GBP
0.00% USD Coin (USDC) 145.58 JPY
0.00% USD Coin (USDC) 4.25 PLN
0.00% USD Coin (USDC) 10.93 SEK

Ethereum’s rollups are ‘gold standard’ but Plasma needs a revisit — Buterin

11-15-2023

Vitalik Buterin called the early Ethereum scaling solution Plasma “underrated” and a “significant security upgrade” for chains that would otherwise be validiums.

Plasma, a once-prominent Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution, should be revisited by teams currently working on zero-knowledge (ZK) Ethereum Virtual Machines (EVMs), said Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.

Invented in 2017, Plasma diverts data and computation — except deposits, withdrawals and Merkle roots — to an off-chain environment.

It was superseded by optimistic and ZK-rollups as the two solutions offered cheaper client-side data storage costs and security properties that “cannot be matched,” Buterin explained in a Nov. 14 X (Twitter) post.

Buterin said rollups remain the “gold standard,” but Plasma is an “underrated design space” that shouldn’t be forgotten.

“Plasma can be a significant security upgrade for chains that would otherwise be validiums,” Buterin added.

“The fact that ZK-EVMs are finally coming to fruition this year makes it an excellent opportunity to re-explore this design space, and come up with even more effective constructions to simplify the developer experience and protect users’ funds.”

Like Plasma, validiums move data and computation off-chain but implement ZK-proofs to validate transactions. Plasma, on the other hand, uses fraud proofs, which are much slower.

Buterin argued improvements in ZK-proofs, such as validity proofs, address the past limitations of Plasma, making it more viable as a scaling solution.

Adapting Plasma for applications beyond payments has also proven to be an Achilles heel for Plasma before ZK-proofs entered the mainstream, Buterin acknowledged.

Buterin expects the Ethereum layer-2 ecosystem to evolve with diverse technological approaches.

Minimal Viable Plasma, Plasma Cash and Plasma Cashflow are among the iterations that have stemmed from Plasma. 

Ethereum layer-2 scaling-focused firm Polygon Labs implemented Plasma in 2019 but has incorporated several other solutions since.

The movement away from Plasma was partially attributed to Plasma Group, a nonprofit research firm announcing that i would cease working on Ethereum-based scalability in January 2020.

OMG, the token of OMG Network — which uses Plasma — spiked 28.6% to $0.78 in a three-hour window following Buterin’s post, according to CoinGecko. However, it has since fallen 14.3% to $0.67.

Source: Cointelegraph.